- BEST CONSTRUCTION TAKEOFF SOFTWARE FOR SMALL BUSINESS MANUAL
- BEST CONSTRUCTION TAKEOFF SOFTWARE FOR SMALL BUSINESS DOWNLOAD
Sattineni says that many construction companies only win about 15 to 20 percent of the jobs that they bid on. Top Reasons for Software PurchasesĪmong those attempting to increase their bid potential, many said they wanted to be more competitive, and others wanted to increase their ability to bid on commercial jobs or larger projects.Īlso connected directly to the business case, 3 percent wanted to avoid profit losses from bidding too low on jobs.Ī smaller amount of buyers cited reasons related to the shortcomings of their current software, including integration requirements (7 percent) and a need for a more user-friendly (5 percent) or cost-effective (2 percent) solution than their current one. Other than these more general pain points, however, many of buyers’ reasons for seeking software were tied to the business case of their construction company: 28 percent indicated that they wanted to be able to grow their business or execute a greater number of bids. The majority of buyers indicated that they wanted to increase efficiency and accuracy, as well as improve organization. Buyers Seek New Software for Growth of Business
BEST CONSTRUCTION TAKEOFF SOFTWARE FOR SMALL BUSINESS MANUAL
Sattineni says that companies doing manual takeoff may easily forget something (for example, they may miscount the number of doors or windows), causing them to bid too low, and thus fail to profit-even when they win the bid. However, manual methods can have some undesirable consequences. Because the profit margin for a small construction business is so low (Sattineni puts it around 2-3 percent), technology investments are harder to absorb than they are for larger businesses. Sattineni also notes that for small businesses, software can be a big investment.
If it’s a general contractor, he says, they may be outsourcing estimating and takeoff to sub-contractors. Sattineni notes a few reasons why construction buyers may not be currently using software. Even if you consider those using non-takeoff software (5 percent) or a combination of different softwares (4 percent), buyers in construction still do not come close to the level of adoption typical in other industries. In other software markets, it’s often the case that buyers are currently using a software they now realize doesn’t fully meet their business needs. “It’s probably just as hard for the same person to pick up after an interval of time.”Īnother finding that surprised us is that only 10 percent of buyers were currently using takeoff software. “It’s very hard for one person to pick up another person’s work ,” says Sattineni. Sattineni acknowledges the “flexibility” of a manual tool like Excel for takeoff, but he points out the difficulty in keeping consistent track of such complex information between different members of the organization.
This is surprising because of the potential complexity of takeoff: a set of tasks that require one to itemize material costs and units of labor for the construction of every floor of a building, down to the concrete, windows, walls, flooring, ceilings, electric, plumbing and so on. Most buyers (63 percent) said they were currently using manual methods alone-encompassing a range of tools, such as scales, rulers, price sheets from local material distributors, Excel spreadsheets and printed plans.
BEST CONSTRUCTION TAKEOFF SOFTWARE FOR SMALL BUSINESS DOWNLOAD
Download Report Most Buyers Are Replacing Manual Takeoff Methods